Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Arbitration Between Edward L. Bealmer and Pat Brown v. Texaco, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 3, 1970No. 23632_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
Edward L. Bealmer and Pat Brown brought this suit against their employer, Texaco, Incorporated, to compel arbitration of a dispute over the interpretation of a back pay provision in a collective bargaining agreement. The parties made cross motions for summary judgment. Texaco’s motion was granted and plaintiffs’ motion was denied. This appeal followed.
Bealmer and Brown, together with thirty-eight other employees of Texaco, had been discharged for alleged dishonesty. At this time, General Truck Drivers, Chauffeurs and Helpers Union, Local 692 (union) was the recognized collective bargaining…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States of America Ex Rel. Ralph Madison H-5666 v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent ScigCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jones-Hamilton Co., a California Corporation v. Beazer Materials & Services, Inc. Kop-Coat, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Tobacco Workers International Union, Local 317 v. Lorillard CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Bel Pre Medical Center, Inc. v. Frederick Contractors, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- James M. O'COnnOr v. United States of America, & Third Party v. Richard Voight, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Aluminum Brick and Glass Workers International Union v. Aaa Plumbing Pottery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.