Legal Opinion

Ham v. Dunmire

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 14, 2003No. 1D02-4564PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

As a sanction for failing to furnish a witness list, failing to list or exchange exhibits, and failing to answer interrogatories timely, even after an agreed order compelling the answers had been entered, the trial court dismissed appellant’s complaint with prejudice.

Although the party herself was in no way at fault, we affirm the judgment of dismissal, certifying conflict with the Third District on this point. See Marin v. Batista, 639 So.2d 630, 630-31 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (“Consequently, since the record reflects absolutely no malfeasance on the part of the appellant, we find that the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Philippe v. Lloyd's Aero BolivianoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Dave's Aluminum Siding, Inc. v. C & M VENTURESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Marin v. BatistaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ham v. DunmireSupreme Court of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API