Ex Parte Young and Levine
Texas Supreme Court
Original application to the Supreme Court for writ of habeas corpus by Young and Levine committed to imprisonment by the 'judge of the District Court of Navarro County for violation of a writ of injunction issued by that court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown
On the 28th day of February, 1910, the local option law was in force in Havarro County, by which the sale of intoxicating liquors was prohibited within the limits of the said county. On that day Chris L. Knox, the county attorney of Havarro County, in the name of the State of Texas, presented to the Honorable H. B. Davis, judge of that judicial district, a petition in which by proper allegations it was charged that M. E. Young and L. Levine were engaged in pursuing the occupation of selling intoxicating liquors in the said county, as well as other things forbidden by the statute which it is…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Allen v. WoodwardTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Allen v. WoodwardTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Ex Parte KottwitzTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Ex Parte SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Ex Parte MabryTexas Supreme Court · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.