Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Peek

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 2, 1967No. 42700PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

1. Enumeration of error 2 complains of the trial judge’s ruling that the exclusion provision of the insurance policy was not effective and the denying of the prayers for declaratory relief.

The policy issued by Nationwide to Watkins Motor Lines, Inc., defines an “insured” as including “. . . the Named Insured and also includes any person while using an owned automobile or a hired automobile and any person or organization legally responsible for the use thereof, provided the actual use of the automobile is by the Named Insured or with his permission.” Both Wilson and Peek were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Transport Insurance Co. v. Standard Oil Co. of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Simpson v. American Automobile Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Iowa National Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. National Hills Shopping Center, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
  4. Carter v. EARLY AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Rowe v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API