Inzerella v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JjSAUNDERS, Judge.
This is an appeal by defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al. (hereinafter WAL-MART), from the trial court’s judgment in favor of L.M. “Tookie” Inzerella (hereinafter TooMe) in the amount of $20,000 for injuries she sustained when she slipped on the defendant’s floor. WAL-MART appeals and contends that the district court erred when it found that: (1) the plaintiff met her burden of proof under Louisiana Revised Statutes 9:2800.6 and that WAL-MART faded to exculpate itself from liability, (2) WAL-MART did not have a right to a jury trial, and (3) TooMe was not comparatively…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Socorro v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Cambridge Corner Corp. v. MenardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
- Arnold v. TG & Y. STORES CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tenpenny v. RinguetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Owens v. Liberty Lloyds Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996