Legal Opinion

Inzerella v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1994No. 92-1371PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JjSAUNDERS, Judge.

This is an appeal by defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al. (hereinafter WAL-MART), from the trial court’s judgment in favor of L.M. “Tookie” Inzerella (hereinafter TooMe) in the amount of $20,000 for injuries she sustained when she slipped on the defendant’s floor. WAL-MART appeals and contends that the district court erred when it found that: (1) the plaintiff met her burden of proof under Louisiana Revised Statutes 9:2800.6 and that WAL-MART faded to exculpate itself from liability, (2) WAL-MART did not have a right to a jury trial, and (3) TooMe was not comparatively…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Socorro v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  3. Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  4. Cambridge Corner Corp. v. MenardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  5. Arnold v. TG & Y. STORES CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tenpenny v. RinguetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Owens v. Liberty Lloyds Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API