Dick-Friedman Ex Rel. Friedman v. Board of Education of West Bloomfield Public Schools
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING COUNTS I & II OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
BATTANI, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. (“IDEA”), and corresponding Michigan laws and rules. Plaintiff, Linda Friedman, brings this action for, and on behalf of, her cognitively impaired son, Danny. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants have violated the IDEA, Michigan’s Mandatory Special Education Act (“MMSEA”), Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 380.1701 et seq., and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Defendants moved for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Carlisle Area School v. Scott P., by and Through His Guardians, Bess P. And Richard E. P., in No. 94-7520. Carlisle Area School District, in No. 94-7539 v. Scott P., by and Through His Guardians, Bess P. And Richard E. PCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.