Legal Opinion

Young v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1977No. 203 Misc. DktPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Judge Rogers,

Jose C. Young, plaintiff, has filed a complaint in mandamus against the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) seeking relief from what he terms an unlawful recomputation of his prison sentence, and credit for prison time served under an allegedly unlawful recommittal against a subsequent *270sentence. The Board has filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer. We sustain the preliminary objections.

The effect of the Board’s demurrer is that we accept as true every fact well pleaded by the plaintiff. Commonwealth v. Toro Development Co., 2 Pa.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Kuykendall v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. DraperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. Toro Development Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rodriques v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Concerned Taxpayers v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Danson v. CaseyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Tate v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Harris v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API