Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Reynolds
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided June 3, 1946No. Civil Action 619PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.
Issue is joined on defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint under Rule 12(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, on the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction of the case because the requisite jurisdictional amount is not involved. 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(1). The question was submitted to the court on oral argument and briefs of respective counsel.
The original complaint was filed by Vera H. Reynolds, a citizen of the State of Oklahoma, against W. D. Reynolds, plaintiff’s former husband, Sybil C. Reynolds, wife of W. D.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Edwards v. Bates CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Brown v. WebsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Pianta v. H. M. Reich Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vicente Acevedo Velez v. Crown Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Richie v. RichieDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Cleartrac v. Lanrick ContractorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- John Regan, Administrator v. Donald Marshall, D/B/A Marshall's Mobilgas StationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- Phoenix Scotts-Sports v. KadishDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.