Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Hayes

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 22, 1985PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.

The plaintiffs Frank and Katherine Hogan own a lot on a private way in Quincy, called Patrick Road, and the two-story house and detached garage thereon. The lot is rectangular, has an area of 5,000 square feet, and a width of 50 feet fronting on the way. The defendants Robert and Mary Hayes own a contiguous lot, similar in shape and area, and with a similar 50 foot frontage on the way. Their lot is vacant. The object of the present (consolidated) action was to prevent the Hayeses from building on their lot. On cross motions for summary judgment, aided by a statement of agreed facts, a judge…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Arrigo v. Planning Board of FranklinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  2. Vokes v. Avery W. Lovell, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  3. Neuhaus v. Building Inspector of MarlboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. Skipjack Cove Marina, Inc. v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. McDonald's Corp. v. Town of SeekonkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Worcester County Christian Communications, Inc. v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  2. Asack v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  3. Bonfatti v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  4. Carabetta v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  5. Cornell v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API