Legal Opinion
Douglas v. Douglas
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided March 9, 1953No. 43002PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
255 S.W.2d 756 (1953)
DOUGLAS
v.
DOUGLAS et al.
No. 43002.
Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1.
March 9, 1953.
Robert E. Seiler, Seiler, Blanchard & Van Fleet, Joplin, for appellant.
Ray E. Watson, F. H. Richart, Rex Titus, Watson, Richart & Titus, Joplin, for respondents.
COIL, Commissioner.
Defendants had verdict and judgment in plaintiff's suit for $10,000 for personal injuries. Plaintiff-appellant contends that the trial court erred in giving instructions. Defendants-respondents urge that plaintiff failed to make a submissible case. We have decided that the instructions attacked are…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ilgenfritz v. Missouri Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Summa v. Morgan Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Van Brock v. First National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Chamberlain v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. HaleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Harbourn v. Katz Drug CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Greyhound Lines, Inc., a Corporation v. Delta MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Dixon v. General Grocery CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Stafford v. Fred Wolferman, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.