Legal Opinion
DeSouza
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit
Decided June 14, 2013No. BAP No. MW 12-091; Bankruptcy No. 11-40315-MSHPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The debtor, Claudinei DeSouza, appeals the bankruptcy court’s determination that certain probate court orders regarding alimony and contempt did not violate the automatic stay. For the reasons set forth below, we REVERSE and REMAND to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings consistent with this decision.
BACKGROUND
The debtor filed a petition under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code1 in January 2011 and, shortly thereafter, he filed his schedules, statements, and a chapter 13 plan. His chapter 13 plan was a 36-month plan that called for payments of $89.00 per month. Payments on his mortgage…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Soto-Rios v. Banco Popular De Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Lessard v. Wilton-Lyndeborough Cooperative School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Slabicki v. GleasonBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2012
- Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art Foundation, Inc. v. BüchelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Coffin v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Coffin)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Witkowski v. Knight (Witkowski)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2014
- In re MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- In re OjiegbeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Carbonneau v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (In re Carbonneau)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
- Jordahl v. Dyal (In re Jordahl)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2016