Legal Opinion

Chabert v. Russell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1896PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Ejectment by Richard Chabert against John A. Russell and another. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action of ejectment for an undivided 1-28 of about 34 acres of land in Ecorse township, Wayne county. The plaintiff was the owner of the land, unless the ownership was cut off by adverse possession. He claims title as the grandson of Francis Chabert, who got title from the United States government in 1821. This land was part of a tract of about 237 acres called “Private Claim No. 42.” It was marsh land, and part of a large marsh, of several hundred acres in extent, which fronted on Detroit river, and was covered with water most of the time until some dredging was done in 1891. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lessee of Ewing v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. Oglesby v. HollisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crosby v. City of GreenvilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Doctor v. TurnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Capital Traction Co. v. CoplandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1917
  4. Village of Manchester v. ClarksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Merritt v. WestermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API