Stanshine v. Kalmar (In Re Kalmar)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM A. KING, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
Presently before the Court is a complaint brought by the plaintiffs to except from discharge a debt arising out of a transaction where money was advanced to the debtors pursuant to a construction contract. The Court finds that this debt is dischargeable in bankruptcy and the complaint will be denied. 1
On October 22, 1980, plaintiffs, Martin and Sandi Stanshine, executed a written agreement with the debtor, Louis Kalmar, for the latter to construct a fireplace at the plaintiffs’ residence. The contract provided that the total price was to be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gleason v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Commonwealth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. CraftonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. AustinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Berk v. Stewart (In Re Stewart)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Richard F. Belfry, Debtor. Richard F. Belfry v. Christopher G. CardozoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Great American Insurance v. Storms (In Re Storms)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1983
- Teamsters Local 533 v. Schultz (In Re Schultz)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1985
- Bailey v. James (In Re James)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1984
- Philadelphia Entertainment & Development Partners, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Department of Revenue (In re Philadelphia Entertainment & Development Partners, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016