Legal Opinion

Stanshine v. Kalmar (In Re Kalmar)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1982No. 19-10532PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM A. KING, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

Presently before the Court is a complaint brought by the plaintiffs to except from discharge a debt arising out of a transaction where money was advanced to the debtors pursuant to a construction contract. The Court finds that this debt is dischargeable in bankruptcy and the complaint will be denied. 1

On October 22, 1980, plaintiffs, Martin and Sandi Stanshine, executed a written agreement with the debtor, Louis Kalmar, for the latter to construct a fireplace at the plaintiffs’ residence. The contract provided that the total price was to be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gleason v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Commonwealth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. CraftonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. AustinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Berk v. Stewart (In Re Stewart)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Richard F. Belfry, Debtor. Richard F. Belfry v. Christopher G. CardozoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  2. Great American Insurance v. Storms (In Re Storms)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1983
  3. Teamsters Local 533 v. Schultz (In Re Schultz)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1985
  4. Bailey v. James (In Re James)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1984
  5. Philadelphia Entertainment & Development Partners, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Department of Revenue (In re Philadelphia Entertainment & Development Partners, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API