Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Progressive Design & Engineering, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 25, 2015No. 4D12-2335Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CERTIFICATION

MAY, J.

We deny the motion for rehearing and for certification. However, we withdraw our previously issued opinion and substitute the following.

A tragic car accident resulted in the death of the plaintiffs father. He now appeals an adverse jury verdict in a negligence action against a company that designed the traffic signals for the intersection. He argues: (1) the trial court erred in finding that the Slavin1 doctrine applied to the design company; (2) the evidence did not support the jury’s finding that the completed intersection had been “accepted”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Slavin v. KaySupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Kala Investments, Inc. v. SklarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Meruelo v. Mark Andrew of Palm Beaches, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. Casey v. Wrought Iron Bridge Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc. v. VaughnSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API