Legal Opinion
Araya v. Bayly
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 11, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-2050PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Henok Araya brings suit against Associate Judge John Bayly of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, alleging that Judge Bayly violated the constitution and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C. Code § 2-1401 et seq., in the course of divorce proceedings initiated by Araya. Araya seeks declaratory relief regarding findings and rulings made' by Judge Bayly and injunctive relief requiring community service. Because Araya’s suit seeks the functional equivalent of appellate review of an adverse…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Skinner v. SwitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- William Penn Apartments, L.P. v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Henok v. KesslerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Laverpool v. Taylor Bean & Whitaker Reo LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Henok v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Baltierra v. Child Protective ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.