Legal Opinion · Dissent

Albert Johnson v. State of Mississippi

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 15, 1974No. 73-1476Published

1Dissent

BROWN, Chief Judge,

with whom WISDOM, THORNBERRY, GOLDBERG and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting:

I dissent to the Court’s denial of rehearing en banc for two reasons. First, the issue is of recurring transcendent importance. Second, the panel’s decision in my opinion is doubtful if not erroneous.

The question of whether the right of removal, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1443(1), should be denied to those persons seeking redress under 18 U.S.C.A. § 245 is of such moment that it cries out for consideration by the en banc court and should not be disposed of by the panel’s sweeping but wholly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Georgia v. RachelSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Claudine Hall v. Sylvia GarsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. 2 Fair empl.prac.cas. 356, 2 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,166 Pete Gomez v. Florida State Employment ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Gilbert Moreno v. Gerald C. Henckel, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. Troy State University and Board of Trustees, Troy State University v. Gary Clinton DickeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API