Johnson v. State

RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Michael Johnson guilty of possessing both marijuana and cocaine with intent to distribute. Johnson appeals, asserting that insufficient evidence supported his conviction. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, “the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence, and we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict to determine if the evidence was sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” We neither resolve conflicts in the evidence nor assess…