Legal Opinion

Bruce Duncan Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 26, 1967No. P67/214; protests 62/2939, etc. (Los Angeles)Published

1Opinion of the CourtEao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist *903of horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc. v. United States (46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of Sherwin International, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. G. Joannou Cycle Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Sherwin International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965