Legal Opinion

Ted Newman v. Hi Hat Elkhorn Coal Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1962No. 14470_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This ease originated in the Circuit Court of Floyd County, Kentucky and was removed by the coal company to the District Court on the ground of diversity of citizenship.

It was an action to recover damages and for injunction to restrain defendant from the processing of coal and dumping of refuse therefrom on plaintiff’s lands which coal had been mined on lands other than plaintiff’s.

The District Judge heard the case without a jury and at the close of the evi dence delivered an oral opinion in which he found in favor of the coal company and dismissed the complaint. He did not adopt findings of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Pike-Floyd Coal Co. v. NunneryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Hi Hat Elkhorn Mining Co. v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Menendez v. Saks And CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Godley v. Kentucky Resources Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. Hi Hat Elkhorn Coal Co. v. KellyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1962
  4. Menendez v. SaksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. HI HAT ELKHORN COAL COMPANY v. KellyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API