Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Soto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 7, 2000, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

*852Claimant contends that she resigned from her position as a traffic manager in a factory because the stress engendered by her job adversely affected her health. Claimant offered no medical evidence to support her contention (see, Matter of Spaulding [Commissioner of Labor], 264 AD2d 881, 882; Matter of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MaineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re the Claim of CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re the Claim of SpauldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of DanglerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of TrzeciakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API