Fisher v. Fountain House, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Helen E. Freedman, J.
Plaintiffs seek a judgment declaring that the apartment in question is not subject to the New York City Rent and Rehabilitation Law (Rent Control Law [Administrative Code of City of New York § Y51-1.0 et seq.]). Defendant leased the apartment in 1962 and has been the statutory tenant since 1964 when the lease expired. Defendant is a not-for-profit corporation which, among other things, locates apartments for individuals who have undergone treatment for psychological disorders.
Since 1962, various individuals affiliated with defendant have occupied the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Koenig v. Jewish Child Care Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Trustees of Columbia University v. SperlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Stahl Associates Co. v. Candid Productions, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tuba Corp. v. Laurence S. Freundlich, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1985
- Centre Continental Co. v. United Cerebral Palsy Ass'n of New York State, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986