Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Fountain House, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Helen E. Freedman, J.

Plaintiffs seek a judgment declaring that the apartment in question is not subject to the New York City Rent and Rehabilitation Law (Rent Control Law [Administrative Code of City of New York § Y51-1.0 et seq.]). Defendant leased the apartment in 1962 and has been the statutory tenant since 1964 when the lease expired. Defendant is a not-for-profit corporation which, among other things, locates apartments for individuals who have undergone treatment for psychological disorders.

Since 1962, various individuals affiliated with defendant have occupied the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Koenig v. Jewish Child Care Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Trustees of Columbia University v. SperlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  4. Stahl Associates Co. v. Candid Productions, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tuba Corp. v. Laurence S. Freundlich, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1985
  2. Centre Continental Co. v. United Cerebral Palsy Ass'n of New York State, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API