Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Ransom

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From tbe Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, C. J.

This action was brought by the appellee, the widow of Hyatt C. Ransom, deceased, against the appellants, to contest the validity and resist the pro*403bate of the supposed last will of said deceased, on the ground that the same had not been duly executed. There was a trial of the cause by the court, resulting in a finding that the supposed will had not been duly executed, and judgment accordingly.

The appellants make no question, here, except that arising on the motion for a new trial.

The supposed will need not be set out, as the sole question presented is, whether it was duly executed. It was…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Albright v. NorthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Potts v. FeltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Herbert v. BerrierIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Moore v. StephensIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API