Rothschild v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, David Rothschild, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 24th day of April, 1914, denying a motion for an injunction pendente lite.
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, J.:
Plaintiff is the owner of the houses and lots known as Nos. 194, 196 and 198 Park Row in the city of New York, on the southwesterly corner of Park Row and Worth street, contain*533ing a frontage of eighty feet nine inches on Park Row. The buildings are occupied for businesses of various characters and are of substantial value.
The defendant Manhattan Railway Company owns and operates an elevated railroad along Park Row in front of plaintiff’s premises, now consisting of'tw'o tracks. In 1905 plaintiff settled with the defendant for the damage suffered by him in consequence of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Uline v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Galway v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Tallman v. Metropolitan Elevated R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Auchincloss v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
3Cited by7 opinions
- Montgomery Light & Traction Co. v. AvantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Appleby v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1975
- Grunzfelder v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Grunzfelder v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.