Legal Opinion

Esposito v. Dior Builders

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 21, 1995No. 1—94—0541PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE COUSINS

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, Michael Esposito, appeals from the trial court’s order of January 10, 1994, granting defendants Dior Builders, Dior Realty, Inc., Dior Builders & Realty, Inc. (defendant Dior Builders, Inc.), Peter Dilorio, and Jim Hansen’s motion for summary judgment in their favor on plaintiff’s claims under the Structural Work Act (see 740 ILCS 150/1 et seq. (West 1992)) and for damages caused by defendants’ negligence. On appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of defendants.

We affirm.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Laffoon v. Bell & Zoller Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lavat v. Fruin-Colnon Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Christman v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Paluch v. DeverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Douglas Theater Corp. v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  2. Garland v. Morgan Stanley and Company, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  3. Wren v. Reddick Community Fire Protection DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. Douglas Theater v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Wren v. Reddick Community Fire Protection DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API