Legal Opinion

State v. Horton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 24, 2026No. 128574Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 128,574 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. TERRY D. HORTON JR., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Before a court may admit double hearsay, a statutory exception must apply to each hearsay statement. 2. An appellate court may independently consider whether a prosecutor erred even if the lower court sustained an objection to the prosecutorial act. 3. A prosecutor does not necessarily shift the burden of proof by comparing a defendant's trial statement with earlier inconsistent statements. Appeal from Wyandotte District Court; COURTNEY MIKESIC, judge.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. KesselringSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. State v. HaislipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. State v. LogsdonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. State v. TagueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API