Legal Opinion · Dissent

Boise Cascade Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 29, 1988No. 86-1240Published

1DissentMikva, Circuit Judge

The majority today tells the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) that manufacturers who charge different prices to competing retailers cannot be held to have violated price discrimination law — unless the FTC somehow overcomes evidence that competition persists in the affected business sector. Apparently, the majority imposes this new evidentiary burden to avoid a result it finds economically unappealing. Even if the majority is right in its economic *1153appraisal, however, the choice is not ours to make. Though born of good intentions, today’s decision disregards the policies that Congress…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. J. Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. And Petroleum Products Co. v. Texaco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API