Legal Opinion · Dissent

Charles Gallagher v. City of Waveland, Mississippi

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided May 19, 2015No. 2013-CP-00273-COAPublished

1DissentCarlton, J.

¶36. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion. I find that the bill of exceptions accepted by the circuit court was fatally defective and failed to provide an intelligent, record upon which the circuit court could act. Because the parties failed to provide a proper bill of exceptions, the circuit .court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction in this case. As a result, I would reverse the circuit court’s judgment and remand this case to allow the. circuit court to rule on the Gallaghers’ motion for a writ of mandamus and to provide the parties *478the opportunity to file a properly amended…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hall v. City of RidgelandMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Falco Lime, Inc. v. Mayor & Aldermen of City of VicksburgMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Stewart v. City of PascagoulaMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  4. WILKINSON COUNTY BD. v. Quality Farms, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Reed, Mayor, Etc. v. AdamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API