Legal Opinion

Bank of United States v. Braveman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtO'Malley, J.

The plaintiff bank, which, for the purposes of the submission is concededly insolvent, sues the defendant as indorser of a note made by Isidor Braveman, Inc. The defendant seeks to set off against her liability as indorser a sum on deposit to her credit with the plaintiff. The maker of the note is conceded to be solvent.

Were it not for the insolvency of the plaintiff, its counsel admits an absolute right of setoff in the defendant indorser. However, because of such insolvency, it is urged that this right becomes subordinate to the equities of general creditors and their right to an equable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Curtis v. . DavidsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Borough Bank of Brooklyn v. MulqueenNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Curtis v. DavidsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bank of United States v. BilgoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API