Legal Opinion

Boyce v. Royal Oak Board of Education

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1979No. 60366, (Calendar No. 3)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, C.J.

Plaintiffs-appellants (hereinafter, plaintiffs), probationary schoolteachers, were employed by defendant during the 1975-1976 school year pursuant to a contract which provided, inter alia, for termination for economic reasons after ten days notice. On or about December 16, 1975, each plaintiff received written notice that his or her contract was being terminated for economic reasons and that the last day of employment would be January 23, 1976. Plaintiffs filed suit seeking to enjoin defendant from terminating their contracts. Plaintiffs claim that they had a statutory right to be employed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shiffer v. Board of Education of Gibraltar School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Rehberg v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MELVINDALE, ECORSE SCH. DIST. NO. 11Michigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Munro v. Elk Rapids SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Munro v. Elk Rapids SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Weckerly v. Mona Shores Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Detroit Board of Education v. ParksMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Detroit Board of Education v. ParksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. VanGessel v. Lakewood Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Sutherby v. Gobles Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Breuhan v. Plymouth-Canton Community SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API