Legal Opinion

Bobbie Brooks, Inc. v. Hyatt

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1976No. 40185PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

This is a contract action brought by the plaintiff, Bobbie Brooks, Incorporated, against the defendant, Maurice Hyatt. The District Court directed a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals that decision. We reverse the decision of the District Court.

In 1962, the defendant became a sales representative *597for Stacy Ames, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Stacy Ames), a subsidiary corporation of Bobbie Brooks, Inc. Pursuant to a written agreement, the defendant’s duties were to promote various lines of women’s apparel which was distributed by Stacy Ames. Samples of such apparel were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rossomanno v. Laclede Cab CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Transport Indemnity Company v. SeibNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Higgins v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Webber v. McCormickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of IndykSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Chalupa v. Hartford Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Misle v. MisleNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. KaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. Central Fidelity Bank v. Denslow (In Re Denslow)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API