Simpson v. State

CATES, Judge.

This cause is part of Simpson v. State, ante p. 58, 179 So.2d 335, where we remanded for what now appears to have been only a labor of love for the due forms of law.

We have carefully reviewed “the entire record including the transcript of the evidence.

The gist of Simpson’s complaint (in brief here) was that on original trial he did not have the benefit of one Benefield’s testifying in his behalf.

Benefield, charged with robbery arising out of the same transaction which led to Simpson’s original conviction, had pleaded guilty. He was put on probation and later, on revocation, went…