Verret v. State Bank of Rolla
North Dakota Supreme Court
'From a judgment of the District Court of Eolette County, Butts, J., defendant appeals. The plaintiff has certainly not shown himself to have been injured in any way in the transaction or suffered any damage or loss on account of the same. The plaintiff, therefore, has no standing in court under the undisputed testimony in this case.
Read the full summary
'From a judgment of the District Court of Eolette County, Butts, J., defendant appeals. The plaintiff has certainly not shown himself to have been injured in any way in the transaction or suffered any damage or loss on account of the same. The plaintiff, therefore, has no standing in court under the undisputed testimony in this case. Balcombe v. Northrop, 9 Minn. 172; Morton v. Stone (Minn.) 39 N. W. 496; Morton v. Hagerman (Minn.) 39 N. W. 497; Steiner Bros. v. Clisby (Ala.) 15 So. 612. The undisputed testimony shows that at the time the check was drawn the maker had no funds on hand in the…
1Opinion of the Court
Christianson, Ch. J.
The controversy before us involves the liability of the defendant bank upon a certain check which it received from the plaintiff for collection. The material facts are substantially as follows:
In June, 1918, the plaintiff was the state’s attorney of Eolette county in this state. • Prior to June 10, 1918, one I. M. Ingebretson was the treasurer of said county. Ingebretson had issued certain fraudulent tax receipts and by means thereof collected moneys from taxpayers of that county. The fraudulent practices were discovered, and on June 1, 1918, or thereabouts, Mr.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Farmers State Bank v. Union National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lloyd Mortgage Co. v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924