Legal Opinion

Smith v. Heath

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 22, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Audubon District Court. — How. H. E. Deemed, Judge. This is an action in equity, and involves the validity of a tax title to forty acres of land. The plaintiff is the owner of the patent title, and claims that the tax title is void. The defendant maintains the validity of the tax deed, and in a cross-bill prays for a decree quieting his title. There was a decree for the defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, C. J.

— It is conceded that all of the proceedings prior to the execution of the tax deed were regular, and in conformity with the statute, excepting the proof of service of the notice of expiration of redemption required by section 894 of the Code. The service of the notice was made by publication, and, in *232order to understand the question made by appellant, it is necessary to set out the proof of service. No objection is made to the form of the notice. It consisted of a printed slip of paper pasted upon a space left for that purpose upon a printed blank form which had been filled up in writing,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rowland v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  2. Stull v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Johnson v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weller v. PlattSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Funson v. BradtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Hoskins v. Iowa Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API