Jumper v. Commercial Bank
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Wallace, J., Bichland, October, 1892. Action by Catharine Jumper against Commercial Bank of Columbia, S. O. For a proper understanding of this case, see Bickley v. Commercial Bank, next case ante. Yerdict was for plaintiff, and defendant appealed. In this case, as in Bickley’s case, Mr. Ernest Gary sat in the place of Mr. Justice McGowan.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
This case is very similar to that of James D. Bickley against Commercial Bank of Columbia, S. C., heard at the same term of court, in which a very elaborate and exhaustive opinion has just been delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Mclver. An extended statement of the facts is, therefore, unnecessary. The principles of law announced in that ease are decisive of the principal exceptions in this case.
The certificates of deposit in this case, which were introduced in evidence against the objection of the appellant, are as follows:
“Interest…
2Cited by5 opinions
- McCallum v. GrierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Gill v. RugglesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
- Hewitt v. Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
- Mitchell v. HamiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
- Funderburg v. Augusta & Aiken Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908