Legal Opinion

Burns v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 17, 1994No. 94-234PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Rotonger Burns filed suit seeking damages as the result of alleged medical malpractice by Peter Carroll. The trial court dismissed the suit, and Ms. Burns appeals. Ms. Burns’s abstract does not contain a brief description or abridgment of her complaint, the response, other pleadings if any, attachments to motions if any, or an abridgment of the trial court’s final order. We have often written that our review on appeal is limited to the record as abstracted and that we will not reach the merits of a case when the documents in the transcript that are necessary for an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. PeeblesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Warnock v. WarnockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. v. DossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Duque v. Oshman's Sporting Goods—Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Gibson Appliance Co. v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Baldwin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API