Haughney v. Gannon
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Walling,
In June, 1916, the defendants, Gannon & Carey, entered into a contract with the School District of the City of Erie for plumbing, heating and ventilating the Academy high school, then in process of construction, for approximately $126,000. The work was undertaken but the increased cost of material and labor soon became such as to render performance so difficult that defendants’ work on the job was practically suspended during the year 1916. Each party to the contract sought to place the blame upon the other for the delay. The time for completion had expired and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stemons v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Albert v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thompson v. American Steel & Wire Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Corbett v. BorandiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Deane M. Corbett, Administrator of the Estate of Philip Kripitzer, Deceased v. Joseph Borandi, Individually and Trading as Joseph Borandi Garage (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff) v. James Freeman and Sears, Roebuck& Company, a Corporation (Third-Party Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Kemmerer v. Troxel, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1952