Legal Opinion

Utley & Boynton v. Dunkelberger

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 20, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Marshall District Court. — Hon. J. L. Stevens, Judge. Action in equity to recover of /Reuben Dunkelberger the amounts due on certain promissory notes, and to foreclose mortgages given to secure their payment. From a decree rendered after a hearing on the merits, Utley & Boynton appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

For some time before March, 1888, the defendant, Beuben Dunkelberger, and his brother Lewis were engaged in the butter and egg business at Marshalltown. Utley & Boynton were-dealers in produce in the city of Boston, and Hillabrand & Dykes were engaged in a similar business in the city of New York. In the month named, Beuben purchased the interest of Lewis in their business, and, for the purpose of raising money required to pay him, on the fourteenth day of that month made his promissory note to Utley & Boynton for the sum of three thousand dollars, with interest at six per cent. per. annum,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stanbrough v. DanielsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Judge v. PowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Federal Land Bank v. SherburneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Harris v. Citizens Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API