Legal Opinion

Warren v. Driscoll

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 25, 1929No. 27,378PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiff appealed from, an order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding a directed verdict or a new trial.

The action is in replevin. Intervener owned and leased a farm to the plaintiff. The lease ivas made September 17, 1927. The rent was $1,040, payable $100 on January 1, 1928, $400 September 1, 1928, and $540 February 1, 1929. The term was from March 1, 1928, to March 1, 1929. The lease contained a chattel mortgage clause covering the crops to be raised.

Plaintiff took possession and apparently raised a good crop. In July he was sent to jail. His horses and equipment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Central Union Trust Co. of N.Y. v. BlankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Tiedt v. BoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Warren v. DriscollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API