Rosell v. Rosell

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellant, plaintiff below, brings this appeal from an order on motions for custody, *87modification, visitation, contempt, and child support, entered by the trial court on September 28, 1977.

Appellant first contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for modification of child support. We disagree. The actions of the trial court are adequately supported by the record and appellant has failed to show any clear abuse of discretion. See, e. g., Krischer v. Krischer, 337 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Kalmutz v. Kalmutz, 299 So.2d 30 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974);…