Legal Opinion

State v. Vinals

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 2019No. A164640Published

1Per curiam

*737Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for racketeering (Count 1), and unlawful delivery of methamphetamine (Counts 3 through 11). Defendant assigns error to several aspects of his sentencing. The state concedes the error on two of those assignments. We write to address only the assignments of error on which the state concedes. Because we must remand the case for resentencing based on those errors, we do not address the remainder of defendant's assignments of error to his sentencing. Additionally, we reject without discussion defendant's assignments of error challenging his convictions.

In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Ortega-GonsalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. SosaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API