Legal Opinion

Pencinse v. Burton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Wasco.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Watson, J.:

A motion was filed in this case by the respondent, to dismiss the appeal upon several grounds. At the hearing, however, all these grounds were expressly waived by respondent’s counsel, except the three last, to which the attention of the court was exclusively directed. They are as follows:

“No sufficient undertaking for the appeal was filed.
“ It does not appear that the surety on the undertaking for appeal possesses the qualifications required by law.
“ It appears by the record that the circuit court had no jurisdiction to reverse or modify the judgment of the justice’s…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mendenhall v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Northern Counties Investment Trust v. HenderWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Newbbrg Orchard Ass'n v. OsbornOregon Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API