Legal Opinion

Pretka v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1937No. Appeal, 4PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Appellee was severely injured in an automobile accident. The testimony showed that he is suffering from traumatic arthritis resulting from the injuries received and that his condition is likely to be progressive requiring future medical attention and hospitalization. The actual expenses and losses to him by reason of the injuries were $1,581.95. The jury returned a verdict of $2,750, whereupon the court granted a new trial on appellee’s motion, solely on the ground that the verdict was inadequate. Appellant insists that the granting of a new trial was an abuse of discretion in that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schwartz v. JaffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Elza v. ChovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Sherman v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Carpenelli v. Scranton Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Muroski v. HnathSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API