Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Altobello

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 16, 1973No. 72-650PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALDEN, Judge.

A real estate salesman sued his broker concerning a real estate commission. Jury verdict and judgment were in favor of the salesman in the sum of $13,947.17. Broker appeals. We reverse because the trial proofs were insufficient as a matter of fact and law.

The real estate involved was the Hart Ranch which was part of an estate which was represented by co-executors, Mr. Charles T. Hart, Jr., and the Exchange National Bank of Winter Haven.

Two things are clear. First, it was agreed between the parties that if the salesman procured a sale, the resulting commission would be divided…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knowles v. HendersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  2. Randolph v. NeeleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Landry v. KosSupreme Court of Florida · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Futura Realty, Inc. v. KasserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. Altobello v. HodgesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API