Hodges v. Altobello
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WALDEN, Judge.
A real estate salesman sued his broker concerning a real estate commission. Jury verdict and judgment were in favor of the salesman in the sum of $13,947.17. Broker appeals. We reverse because the trial proofs were insufficient as a matter of fact and law.
The real estate involved was the Hart Ranch which was part of an estate which was represented by co-executors, Mr. Charles T. Hart, Jr., and the Exchange National Bank of Winter Haven.
Two things are clear. First, it was agreed between the parties that if the salesman procured a sale, the resulting commission would be divided…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Knowles v. HendersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- Randolph v. NeeleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Landry v. KosSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
3Cited by2 opinions
- Futura Realty, Inc. v. KasserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Altobello v. HodgesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973