Legal Opinion

United States v. Holguin

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided October 1, 1996No. Criminal 3:95cr136 (DJS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SQUATRITO, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on Defendant Bova’s Supplemental Motion for Order that Government Produce Informant for Interview as well as his Renewed Motion to Suppress Evidence and Statements. The government is ordered to arrange for an in camera examination to be conducted by the court so that the court may determine whether disclosure is warranted.

I. BACKGROUND

The Defendant Salvatore Bova (“Bova” or “Defendant”) was indicted along with co-Defendant Alexander Holguin (“Holguin” or “co-Defendant”) for conspiracy to possess with intent…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. Pablo BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. David Manley and Fluer WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Butcher v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. United States v. JacobsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API