Oak Downs, Inc. v. Schmid
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentBond, Justice
The only statute under which the appel-lee, R. A. (Smoot) Schmid, claims the right to bring this suit as a private citizen is article 4667 of our Revised Statute, which authorizes “the habitual use, actual, threatened or contemplated, of any premises, place or building or part thereof, * * * be enjoined at the suit of either the State or any citizen thereof * * * for gaming or keeping or exhibiting games prohibited by law.”
The right to enjoin by a private citizen is limited to the prohibited games mentioned in article 4667 (act passed in 1905, c. 153). The right to enjoin by the Attorney…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Herring v. Houston National Exchange BankTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Featherstone v. Independent Service Station Ass'n of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Wright v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1848
- Ex Parte RoquemoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Ex Parte CowardTexas Supreme Court · 1920
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.