Legal Opinion · Dissent

Oak Downs, Inc. v. Schmid

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 13, 1936No. 12094Published

1DissentBond, Justice

The only statute under which the appel-lee, R. A. (Smoot) Schmid, claims the right to bring this suit as a private citizen is article 4667 of our Revised Statute, which authorizes “the habitual use, actual, threatened or contemplated, of any premises, place or building or part thereof, * * * be enjoined at the suit of either the State or any citizen thereof * * * for gaming or keeping or exhibiting games prohibited by law.”

The right to enjoin by a private citizen is limited to the prohibited games mentioned in article 4667 (act passed in 1905, c. 153). The right to enjoin by the Attorney…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Herring v. Houston National Exchange BankTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Featherstone v. Independent Service Station Ass'n of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Wright v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Ex Parte RoquemoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Ex Parte CowardTexas Supreme Court · 1920

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API