Legal Opinion

Claim of Thanhauser v. Milprint, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which disallowed his claim for disability due to injuries which he sustained when struck by an automobile after alighting from his own car, stopped by reason of a flat tire. Claimant, an outside salesman, was requested by his employer to go from Albany, where he resided and maintained his office, to New York City to attend to some business there. He planned to remain away overnight and on the next day to make business calls at Poughkeepsie and Kingston on his return trip to Albany. In New York, after completing his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Claim of Schneider v. United Whelan Drug StoresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Claim of Daly v. State Insurance FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Claim of Neff v. Franklinville Roofing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Claim of Neff v. Franklinville Roofing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bruske v. ArnoldIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Catalfo v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. Bruske v. ArnoldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. Catalfo v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API