Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
365 U.S. 336 (1961)
ARO MANUFACTURING CO., INC., ET AL.
v.
CONVERTIBLE TOP REPLACEMENT CO., INC.
No. 21.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 13, 17, 1960.
Decided February 27, 1961.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.
David Wolf argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners.
Elliott I. Pollock argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
Ralph S. Spritzer argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Charles H. Weston and Richard H. Stern.
2Opinion of the Court · WhittakerJustice Whittaker
On…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Black; Concurrence · Brennan.
3Cases cited43 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.