Legal Opinion

In Re Julie Ann FUSILIER

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 27, 2016No. 2016-B -0016PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

11 This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Julie Ann Fusilier, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana, but currently ineligible to practice.1

*1152FORMAL CHARGES

In April 2014, respondent broke into her ex-husband’s home and stole a man’s diamond ring (valued at approximately $13,000) and a woman’s Rolex watch (valued at approximately $6,000). Respondent then sold the ring and the watch to Diamond Distributors Inc. for approximately $2,700 and used the money to gamble. On May 20, 2014, respondent was…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  4. In re DonnanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  5. In re SterlingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re FusilierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2019
  2. In re FusilierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2019
  3. In re WardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API