San Francisco Lumber Co. v. O'Neil
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the superior court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action to enforce several mechanics’ and materialmen’s liens. The defendants, Edward and Mary E. O’Neil, were the owners of the property against which the liens are sought to he enforced, and entered into a written contract with the contractors, Cook & Wry, for the construction of the building involved in this action. The court below rendered judgment for plaintiffs foreclosing their liens for certain amounts *456of money, the judgment being based upon the theory that the contract between the owners and Cook & Wry was a valid contract within the meaning of the mechanics’ lien…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Greig v. RiordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burnett v. GlasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Howe v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- In Re GillettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- L. W. Blinn Lumber Co. v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- L. W. Blinn Lumber Co. v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900