County of Bay ex rel. Houghtaling v. Brock
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.
1DissentGraves, J.
I agree with the circuit judge that the declaration shows no cause of action. The law *50cannot be changed by the'mode of entitling the cause, or by the fashioning of the declaration. The defendant Brock was elected sheriff and gave a bond, with the other defendants as sureties, for the discharge of his duties in a proper manner. It was framed in accordance with the statute (Comp. L. §§ 550-1) in all respects, except that in place of being made to “ the people of this State,” it was drawn and executed as running to “ the county of Bay.” It was approved in the same manner by the board of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dugan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- Clay Fire & Marine Insurance v. Huron Salt & Lumber Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Forrest v. O'DonnellMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Johr v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Lyell v. Lapeer CountyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan · 1855
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.